Thursday, March 28, 2013
Taking Prisoners in the War Against Gluttony
In the “Celebrating Small Victories” category, on Ash
Wednesday, February 13 I weighed in at an embarrassing 190 lbs.
which gave me a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 27.5—overweight but thankfully still
well shy of being clinically obese. Sunday, February 17 I preached
on the sin of gluttony (see blog post below) and pledged to my congregation to practice what I was
preaching. This morning, 43 days later, the scale read 175.5 lbs. (BMI = 25.4)—still
overweight but within striking distance of 172.5 at which point my BMI will be
24.9 and I will finally be back in the “normal” weight range for my height. My
goal is to stabilize at 160 lbs. by Memorial Day, a weight I don’t think I’ve seen
since my college days. Having an accountability group of 150+ does motivate!
Thursday, March 14, 2013
The Challenges Faced by Pope Francis
From the perspective of a lifelong Baptist, I believe that
Pope Francis has assumed leadership of a Roman Catholic Church confronted by
two very different challenges. One is the result of a profound moral failure.
The other is a complex collection of problems in which theological and cultural
issues are deeply—perhaps hopelessly—intertwined.
The moral problem is the most urgent. It is the shocking
disgrace of pedophile priests and the equally scandalous failure of church
authorities to face and address the problem. Indeed, instead of confronting the
problem, in too many instances there was a conspiracy to cover it up. The
result has been hypocrisy squared.
First, the hypocrisy of men who had vowed celibacy but who in fact engaged in
sexual behavior that was both immoral and illegal in nature. This sin was then
compounded by the added hypocrisy of bishops who lied and falsified evidence in
an attempt to shield the guilty and protect the image (and financial resources)
of the church. We’re not just talking here about a case of Catholics failing to
meet some extraordinary code of behavior such as priestly celibacy. This was
the failure of men in positions of leadership and trust to live up to the most
basic standards of decent upright human behavior. Priests doing things that
would get an atheist arrested. I know of nothing more toxic to a Christian
community than hypocrisy. It has cost the RCC the trust of its own parishioners
and the respect of the outside community. Until this issue is thoroughly and
openly vetted and purged, the church will lack the moral authority and resolve
to address the other problems facing Catholics.
The second challenge is actually a long list of separate
issues involving both theological and cultural concerns. The ordination of
women, marriage for priests and nuns, birth control, abortion, beliefs about
homosexuality, a dying European base, diversity of belief and practice in
Africa—the list goes on and on. Dealing with these issues is far more
complicated than the simple if painful business of true repentance needed to
address the moral lapse. It requires the church’s leadership to distinguish
between adjustments that are possible without a change in church doctrine, such
as the decision coming out of Vatican II to allow the mass to be said in the
vernacular instead of in Latin, and changes that would require sometimes
profound doctrinal shifts. Addressing these later issues is fraught with peril.
It is the difference between a valiant and forthright admission that you were
mistaken in your interpretation of Christ’s teachings and a craven collapse in
the face of outside cultural pressure from assorted special interest groups. Courage
or cowardice. As a Protestant I would obviously differ with my Catholic brethren
on any number of doctrines. But for change to be a corrective, it must be for
the right reasons. The new Bishop of Rome has a reputation for humility. I hope and pray that with this comes great wisdom combined with strength and
vitality that belies his 76 years. With the challenges before him, he will need
it.
Thursday, March 07, 2013
Review of The Bible
Part 1 of a 10-hour
miniseries on The History Channel
The Bible for Dummies
came out in 2002. It will soon be eight years since the publication of The Complete Idiot’s Guide to the Bible.
I suppose it was only a matter of time until somebody tried to do something
similar on TV. But who would produce such a show? Which of the cable channels
would be most likely to broadcast an over-simplified, dumbed down miniseries about
the Bible? Perhaps Fox, with such hits like American
Idol, The Simpsons, Family Guy and the like. Or maybe A&E which brought
Dog the Bounty Hunter and Storage Wars into our homes. My first
guess, whoever, would have been Bravo, which has produced all of those highly
edifying Real Housewives of… reality
shows. I have to admit I was a little surprised to learn that it was my beloved
History Channel that ended up being the culprit.
In 2002 MAD Magazine did one of their many spoofs—something they
excel at doing. This time it was a spoof of one of my favorite books, The Lord of the Rings. Only MADs version
was Bored of the Rings. Watching Part
One of The Bible I sometimes thought
I was just witnessing dumbed down, over simplified story telling. But at other
times I thought we had crossed over into parody, a Bored of the Rings approach to the Bible. The dumbed down aspect is
forgivable if you accept the underlying premise of the project: an attempt at a
sweeping overview of a book as massive and as complex as the Bible in only ten
hours (minus time for commercials). With such time constraints you cannot begin
to hit all the highlights, to say nothing of exploring the nuisance and complex
theological concepts underlying these stories from Scripture. And this also means
that you are prepared to accept a lot of what Hollywood calls “compression”. At
best this gives you a Reader’s Digest version of the story. At worst you get
the Classics Comic Book version of War
and Peace. Too often the story compression in The Bible was of the Classics Comic Book variety, requiring numerous
voice-overs by a narrator to keep someone unfamiliar with the biblical text
from becoming hopelessly lost. We ended up with more a collection of story
boards than a story; brief disconnected snap shots with little to connect them.
But my biggest disappointment was when the creators of The Bible chose to use some of those
precious minutes of airtime to indulge in what could only be called parody.
Perhaps the most blatant example was the portrayal of the angels that came to
Lot’s rescue in Sodom. In over half a century of bible reading it never once
crossed my mind to conceive of angelic visitors as ninja warriors, yet that is
exactly what we were given in this bizarre episode. Similar creative license
run amok was exercised in the scenes showing a young Prince Moses engaged in
knife fights with the crown prince of Egypt. I just stared at the TV screen in
open-mouth incredulity. I suppose next we will be subjected to some creative cross
marketing scheme in which Moses the
Action Figure will be given out in MacDonald’s Kid’s Meals.
Producers Roma Downey and Mark Burnett consulted “a wide
range of pastors and academics” in developing the script for The Bible, including their friend, Joel
Osteen. Osteen’s involvement could explain a lot. But I am baffled that
respected evangelical leaders such as Pastor Rick Warren of Saddleback Church
and Leith Anderson, a leading Minnesota pastor and the President of the National
Association of Evangelicals, also lent their support to this miniseries. I can
only assume that they view this disappointing effort with a sense of
pragmatism. Just maybe someone unfamiliar with the Bible—the book—will watch
The Bible—the miniseries—and be moved to dig deeper and actually go back to the
source material. And once you get people reading the Bible then anything is
possible. If God can work His will through the embarrassing efforts of
preachers, then surely He can do something with a TV show.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)